Donate: 
E. UNITED NATIONS
As a matter of Statutes / Laws governing such matters, it is important to provide evidence that “PRIOR” to seeking “INTERNATIONAL” options, that the United States of America’s / United States’ Officials and / or Representatives were timely, properly and adequately notified, etc. that “INTERNATIONAL” options will be pursued as a direct and proximate result of “FAILURE TO ACT,” etc.! Moreover, that said failure to act has resulted in a “pattern of practice,” “path of criminality,” and / or much more . . . – i.e. thus, posing a GLOBAL THREAT to the Public / World:
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the combination in crime makes more likely the commission of other crimes and because it decreases the probability that the individuals involved will depart from their path of criminality. - - U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819 (2003)
114 In 2007, the United Nations passed the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, to help eliminate human rights violations against them. It creates a framework for laws to make sure that issues are addressed by working directly with Indigenous communities.
There are 46 Articles, or rules, in the Declaration, including:
-- Indigenous peoples are free and equal to all others and have the right to be free from any kind of discrimination, including discrimination based on their Indigenous origin or identity (Article Two).
-- Indigenous people have the right to live in freedom, peace and security.
-- They must be free from genocide and other acts of violence including the removal of their children by force (Article Seven).
-- Indigenous peoples have the right to practice and revitalise their cultural traditions and customs (Article Eleven).
-- Indigenous peoples shall not be removed from their land by force. Where they agree, they should be provided compensation, and, where possible, have the possibility to return (Article 10).
-- Indigenous peoples must not be discriminated against in matters connected with employment (Article 17).
-- Governments shall consult properly with Indigenous peoples before adopting laws and policies that may affect them. They must use the principles of free, prior and informed consent – which means giving Indigenous peoples all the facts needed to make decisions (Article 19).
-- Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use and control their lands, waters and other resources. Governments shall recognise and protect these lands, waters and resources (Article 26).
This Declaration is unique in that it was the first UN document created for the people, by the people: Indigenous People from all over the world helped to develop it, and it took more than two decades of discussions.
As of 06/24/2022: https://www.amnesty.org.au/how-it-works/what-are-indigenous-rights/
115 The United States’ so-called Statutes / Laws are clear in addressing the “power to prevent” and / or “failure to prevent.”
UNITED STATES CODE – Power / Failure to Prevent (42 USC § 1986):
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned . . . are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; . . .
116 Record evidence will support that as early as June 2006, Vogel Denise Newsome timely, properly, and adequately pursued what she believed to be lawful recourse and reporting of criminal acts, etc. against her to the United States Congress as well as the United States Department of Justice! To no avail!
June 1, 2006, Letter From United States Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran (“Cochran”):
As of 06/15/2022: https://www2.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/060106-letter-from-thad-cochran
https://bringingglobalawareness.website/06-01-2006-thad-cochran-letter-to-denise-newsome
https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c6c638e5f6173b8a597
June 26, 2006, Federal Bureau of Investigation Complaint:
https://www2.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/062606-fbi-complaint-mississippi-matter
https://bringingglobalawareness.website/06-26-2006-federal-bureau-of-investigation-complaint
https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c6c638e5f626da8709f
117 There is record evidence to support that United States Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran advising,
“This appears to be a private, legal matter. However, in an effort to be of assistance, I have contacted the proper Office of the Attorney General officials in your behalf. As soon as I receive a report from them, I will get back in touch with you.”
Nevertheless, Cochran failed to provide Vogel Denise Newsome with a report. Thus, a reasonable mind may conclude Office of the Attorney General Officials failed to respond.
118 There is record evidence to support that (at the time of Thad Cochran’s addressing Vogel Denise Newsome's matter), the United States Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz also having one of their Attorneys (J. Keith Kennedy) serving "as the majority staff director of the Committee on Appropriations from January 2005 to September 2006, under the chairmanship of Senator Thad Cochran . . ."
119 About July and August 2008, there is prima facie evidence to support that Vogel Denise Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY, and ADEQUATELY notified Members of the so-called United States Congress of their “privately held company” engaging in “Systematic Discriminatory” practices, as well as criminal practices throughout their company’s so-called Judicial Branch and / or Executive Branch! Moreover, evidence to support request(s) for timely INVESTIGATIONS, HEARINGS, and FINDINGS! To no avail!
120 Vogel Denise Newsome submitting to United States Senator Patrick Leahy, her July 14, 2008: Emergency Complaint and Request For Legislature / Congress Intervention; Also Request For Investigations, Hearings and Findings [“07/14/08 EC&RFL…” - As of 06/15/2022:
As of 06/21/2022:
https://www2.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/leahy-patrick-082008-letteremergency-complaint
https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c6c638e585f74b7a6ae
https://bringingglobalawareness.website/08-20-2008-letter-to-patrick-leahy-and-emergency-complaint
121 United States / Senator Patrick Leahy failing to act on “07/14/08 EC&RFL…” – i.e. taking a far departure from the Statutes / Codes / Rules / Regulations governing said matters!
Berry vs. American Express Pub., Corp., 381 F.Supp. 2d 1118 (2005) - Where source of legal authority is statutory and NOT constitutional, Congress retains ability to CREATE and DIRECT law, so long as it is consistent with constitutional principles, and it is particularly important for COURT to follow that DIRECTIVE.
Watkins v. U.S., 77 S.Ct. 1173 (1957) - [n.2] Power of Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process, and is broad.
[n.5] In conducting investigation, Congress is not a law enforcement or trial agency and no inquiry is an end in itself, but it must be related to and in furtherance of a legitimate task of Congress.
[2][5]We start with several basic premises on which there is general agreement. The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them. It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste. But, broad as is this power of inquiry, it is not unlimited. There is no general authority to expose the private affairs of individuals without justification in terms of the functions of the Congress.
This was freely conceded by the Solicitor General in his argument of this case. FN8 Nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency. These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government. No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress. . . .
FN8. ‘Now, we don't claim on behalf of the Government that there is any right to expose for the purposes of exposure. And I don't know that Congress has ever claimed any such right. But we do say, in the same breath, that there is a right to inform the public at the same time you inform the Congress.’
122 About August 2, 2008, Vogel Denise Newsome submitting to then United States Senator Barack Obama (i.e. later alleged to become elected United States President in November 2008), her July 14, 2008: Emergency Complaint and Request For Legislature / Congress Intervention; Also Request For Investigations, Hearings and Findings - As of 06/20/2022:
As of 06/21/2022: https://www2.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-letter-of-080208-emergency-complaint
https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c6c638e586075beac6b
https://bringingglobalawareness.website/08-02-2008-letter-to-barack-obama-and-emergency-complaint
123 United States / Senator Barack Obama failed to act on “07/14/08 EC&RFL…” – i.e. taking a far departure from the Statutes / Codes / Rules / Regulations governing said matters!
Page vs. Shelby, 995 F.Supp. 23 (1998) - VINDICATION of PUBLIC interest in governmental observance of Constitution and law is FUNCTION of Congress and President, NOT judiciary.
124 About August 2, 2008, Vogel Denise Newsome submitting to United States Senator John McCain (now deceased), her July 14, 2008: Emergency Complaint and Request For Legislature / Congress Intervention; Also Request For Investigations, Hearings and Findings - As of 06/20/2022:
As of 06/21/2022: https://www2.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/mc-cain-john-080211-letter-emergency-complaint
https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c6c638e5860767d6b9b
https://bringingglobalawareness.website/08-02-2008-letter-to-john-mccain-and-emergency-complaint
