UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS and CRIME

EXTORTION RACKETEERING

 

 

United States of America's and Its Legal Counsel's

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz PC

CRIMINALIZED MONOPOLIES GLOBAL OPERATIONS

 

 

SOCIAL MEDIA FORUMS

 

 

MEDICATIONS / DRUGS (i.e. Illegal) OPERATIONS

 

 

INSURANCE COMPANIES OPERATION

 

 

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

TOWN OF UTICA, MISSISSIPPI

RACKETEERING SCHEMES TO EXTORT MONIES

 

 

October 1, 2018

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

NOTIFICATION OF FRAUD

 

USA Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Is Also Legal Counsel For The State Of Mississippi and Its Agencies (As The Town Of Utica) - i.e. Engaging in criminal racketeering schemes requiring their FRAUDULENT Law Enforcement Agencies to create and file FALSE Police Reports, etc. for purposes of EXTORTION . . .of Monies to FINANCE operations! 

 

 

CREATION OF FALSE CRIMINAL CHARGES

FOR PURPOSES OF EXTORTION 

 

 

In this way, members of powerful organized criminal groups have drawn salaries from companies without performing any work, after they threatened the businesses. These fictitious "on the books" jobs are fraudulent and set up to hide their illicit income sources (Capeci and Mustain, 1996; Jacobs with Friel and Radick, 1999; Maas, 1999).

 

 

 

There is no precise estimate of the extent of extortion racketeering, although empirical studies have been done on the topic. For instance, interviews conducted with business owners in ethnic communities in New York City found that most admitted to being approached by gangs for money, goods, or services and that most of these businesses paid what was asked. In other locations around the world, as many as four-fifths of all businesses have paid some form of extortion, but the numbers vary. These studies show that systematic extortion racketeering occurs most often with small businesses in urban locations, where the police cannot be relied upon for protection (Chin, Ko-lin, 1996; Finckenauer and Waring, 2000; Finckenauer and Ko-lin Chin, 2007; Gambetta, 1996; Paoli, 2003; Tulyakov, 2001).

 

 

Extortion by public officials (rather than by organized criminal groups) might also occur as ongoing racketeering when public officials are used to threaten to exercise their official authority if they do not receive a payment or favour (which is thus provided under duress). The threatened actions can involve writing a summons, giving false testimony, conducting an official inspection, fabricating a criminal charge as well as denying a government contract. Therefore, extortion racketeering applies to a variety of systematic behaviours, all of which involve obtaining property by way of coercion or threats, implied or explicit, of some future harm.

 

 

 

NOTE:  The Town of Utica, Mississippi did NOT have a "Chamber Of Commerce" at the time these Racketeering Schemes were being carried out!  So WHERE did the stamp used on the document come from?  Then, WHY was a "Chamber Of Commerce" Stamp used instead of a "COURT" Stamp?  Because the "Town Of Utica, Mississippi" is a "PRIVATELY" held company and does NOT have a LAWFUL Court operating!  ALL is a sham and has been documented and applicable INTERESTED persons engaging in these CRIMINAL RACKETEERING Schemes were NOTIFIED!

 

 

 

It has been found in some cases that victims are willing to pay extortion to powerful organized criminal groups for protection in order to avoid being extorted by a continuing series of individual criminals or local gangs. In different countries and different continents, the use of extortion on a systematic basis appears to occur with some regularity (Anita, 2009; Rusev, 2016; Chin, Ko-lin, 1996).

 

 

BANKING (FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS) PONZI / RACKETEERING SCHEMES